Revisión de las técnicas para el modelado de la distribución de las especies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v4i1.47Palabras clave:
patrones espaciales, modelos de distribución de especiesResumen
En los últimos años se ha generalizado una nueva herramienta que permite analizar objetivamente los patrones espaciales de presencia de organismos: los modelos de distribución de especies. Estos modelos se basan en procedimientos estadísticos y cartográficos que a partir de datos reales de presencia permiten inferir zonas potencialmente idóneas en función de sus características ambientales. Los datos de colecciones de historia natural pueden ser utilizados para este fin adquiriendo así una nueva utilidad. En este trabajo se hace una revisión sobre la variedad de métodos utilizables, sus potencialidades e inconvenientes y los factores limitantes que influyen en la interpretación de los modelos de distribución.
Descargas
Citas
Anderson, R. 2003. Real vs. srtefactual absences in species distributions: tests for Oryzomys albigularis (Rodentia: Muridae) in Venezuela. En: Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Phillips, S., R. Anderson & R. Schapire. 2006. Ecological Modelling, 190: 231 - 259.
Araújo, M. B. & A. Guisan. 2006. Five (orso) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 33:1677-1688.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x
Araujo, M. B. & M. New. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22: 42-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
Baldwin, R. A. 2009. Use of máximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy, 11: 854-866.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e11040854
Barbet-Massin, M., B. A.Walther, W. Thuiller, C. Rahbek & F. Jiguet. 2009. Potential impacts of climate change on the winter distribution of Afro-Palearctic migrant passerines. Biology Letters, 23: 248-251.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0715
Boria, R. A., L. E. Olson, S. M. Goodman & R. P. Andersona. 2014. Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling, 275: 73-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
Breiman, L. 2001. Random forest. Machine Learning, 45: 5-32. Busby, J. R. Bioclim A. bioclimate analysis and prediction system. In: Margules, C. R. & Austin, M. P. (eds.). Nature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis. Canberra: CSIRO, 1991, p. 64-68.
Deblauwe, V., N. Barbier, P. Couteron, O. Lejeune & J. Bogaert. 2008. The global biogeography of semi-arid periodic vegetation patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17:715-723.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00413.x
Edwards, J. T. C., D. R. Cutler, N. E. Zimmermann, L. Geiser & G. G. Moisen. 2006. Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models. Ecological Modelling, 199: 132-141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.016
Elith, J. & J. Leathwick. 2009. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Reviews for Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40:677-697.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
Elith, J. 2002. Quantitative methods for modeling species habitat: Comparative performance and an application to Australian plants. In S. Ferson and M. Burgman (Eds.), Quantitative methods for conservation biology, 39-58. New York: Springer-Verlag.
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22648-6_4
Elith, J., C. H. Graham, R. P. Anderson, M. Dudík, S. Ferrier, A. Guisan, R. J.
Hijmans, F. Huettmann, J. R. Leathwick, A. Lehmann, J. LI, L. G. Lohmann, B. A. Loiselle, G. Manion, C. Moritz, M. Nakamura, Y. Nakazawa, J. M. Overton, A. T. Peterson,; S. J. Phillips, , K. S. Richardson, R. Scachetti-Pereira, R. E. Schapire, J. Soberón, S. Williams, M. S. Wisz & N. E. Zimmermann.2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29:129-151.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Elith, J., S. Phillips, T. Hastie, M. Dudik, Y. Chee & C. A. Yates. 2011. Statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17: 43-57.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
Elton, C. 1927. Animal Ecology. Sedgwick and Jackson, London.
Felicísimo A. M., J. Muñoz, C. Villalba & R. G. Mateo. 2011. Análisis de impactos y vulnerabilidad de la flora y vegetación españolas ante el cambio climático. Oficina Española de Cambio Climático, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, España. 530 pp.
Ferrier, S. & Guisan, A. 2006 Spatial modelling of Biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43: 393-404.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01149.x
Grinnell, J. 1917. The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk, 34: 427-433.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4072271
Guisan, A. & N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecoogical Modeling, 135: 147-186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
Guisan, A. & W. Thuiller. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8: 993-1009.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
Guisan, A., J. R. Edwards & T. Hastie. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distribution: Setting the scene. Ecological Modelling, 157:89-100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1
Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones & Jarvis, A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 25:1965-1978.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
Hirzel, A. H. & G. L. Lay. 2008. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45 1372-1381.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x
Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, 22: 415-427.
https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039
Jackson, S. T. & J. T. Overpeck. 2000. Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the Late Quaternary. Paleobiology, 26:194-220.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300026932
https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[194:ROPPAC]2.0.CO;2
Jiménez-Valverde, A., J. M. Lobo & J. Hortal. 2008. Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 14:885-890.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x
Kearney, M. & W. P. Porter. 2009. Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. Ecology Letters, 12: 334-350.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x
Le maître, D. C., W. Thuiller & L. Schonegevel. 2008. Developing an approach to defining the potential distributions of invasive plant species: a case study of Hakea species in South Africa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17:569-584.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00407.x
Maciel-Mata, C. A., N. Manríquez-Morán, P. Octavio-Aguilar & G. Sánchez-
Rojas. 2015. El área de distribución de las especies: revisión del concepto. Acta Universitaria, 25: 3-19.
https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2015.690
Mackey, B. & D. Lindenmayer. 2001.Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals. Journal of Biogeography, 28: 1147 - 1166.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00626.x
Margules, C. R. & R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405: 243-252.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251
Marini, M. A., M. Barbet-Massin, J. Martínez, N. P. Prestes & F. Jiguet. 2010. Applying ecological niche modelling to plan conservation actions for the Red-spectacled Amazon (Amazona pretrei). Biological Conservation, 143:102-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.009
Marmion, M., M. Parviainen, M. Luoto, R. K. Heikkinen & W. Thuiller. 2009. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 15:59-69.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00491.x
Martínez-Meyer, E. & A. T. Peterson. 2006. Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene- to-Recent transition. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1779-1789.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482_33_10.x
Mateo, R. G., A. M. Felicísimo & J. Muñoz. 2011. Modelos de distribución de especies: una revisión sintética. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 84:217-240.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2011000200008
Orme, C. D. L., R. G. Davies, V. A. Olson, G. H. Thomas, T. S. Ding, P. C. Rasmussen, R. S. Ridgeley, A. J. Stattersfield, , Bennett, P. M., I. P. F. Owens, T. M. Blackburn & J. K. Gaston. 2006. Global patterns of geographic range size in Birds. PLoS Biology, 4:1276-1283.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040208
Papes, M. & P. Gaubert. 2007. Modelling ecological niches from low numbers of occurrences: Assessment of the conservation status of poorly known viverrids (Mammalia, Carnivora) across two continents. Diversity and Distributions, 13: 890-902.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00392.x
Parviainen, M., M. Luoto & R. K. Heikkinen. 2009. The role of local and landscape level measures of greenness in modelling boreal plant species richness. Ecological Modeling, 220: 2690- 2701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.07.017
Pearson R. G. & T. P. Dawson. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models: What they detect and what they hide - response to Hampe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13: 469-476.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00090.x
Pennington, T. & J. Sarukhán. 2005. Árboles tropicales de México. Manual para la identificación de las principales especies. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Peterson, A. T. 2006. Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodiversity Informatics, 3:59-72.
https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v3i0.29
Peterson, A. T., J. Soberón, R. Pearson, R. Anderson, E. Martínez - Meyer, M. Nakamura & M. Bastos. 2011. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. U. S. A. 316.
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691136868.003.0003
Peterson, A. T., M. Pape & M. Eaton. 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: A comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography, 30:550-560.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.05102.x
Peterson, A. T., V. Sanchez-Cordero, C. Ben Beard & J. M. Ramsey. 2002. Ecologic niche modeling and potential reservoirs for Chagas disease, Mexico. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8:662-667.
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0807.010454
Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson & R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographicdistributions. Ecological Modeling,190:231-259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Prasad, A. M., L. R. Iverson & A. Liaw. 2006. Newer classifi cation and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems, 9:181-199.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1
Raxworthy, C. J., E. Martinez-Meyer, N. Horning, R. A. Nussbaum, G. E. Schneider et al. 2003. Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. Nature Biotechnology 426: 837-841.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02205
Reddy, S. & L. M. Dávalos. 2003. Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 30: 1719-1727.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x
Richardson, D. M. & R. J. Whittaker. 2010. Conservation biogeography- foundations, concepts and challenges. Diversity and Distributions, 16: 313-320.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00660.x
Riordan,E. C. & P. W. 2009. Rundel. Modelling the distribution of a threatened habitat: the California sage scrub. Journal of Biogeography, 36: 2176-2188.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02151.x
Rowe, R. J. 2005. Elevational gradient analyses and the use of historical museum specimens: A cautionary tale. Journal of Biogeography, 32:1883-1897.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01346.x
Rushton, S. P.; S. J. Ormerod & G. Kerby. 2004. New paradigms for modelling species distributions? Journal of Applied Ecology, 41:193-200.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00903.x
Schulman, L., T. Toivonen & K. Ruokolainen. 2007. Analysing botanical collecting effort in Amazonia and correcting for it in species range estimation. Journal of Biogeography, 34:1388-1399.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01716.x
Smith, H. M. & E. H. Taylor. 1950. An annotated checklist and key to the reptiles of Mexico exclusive of the snakes. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 199: 1-253.
https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.199
Soberón, J. & A. T. Peterson. 2004. Biodiversity informatics: Managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 359: 689-698.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1439
Soberón, J. & A. T. Peterson. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics, 2:1-10.
https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.4
Soberón, J. & M. Nakamura. 2009. Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions. PNAS. 06: 19644 - 19650. Soberón, J. 2012. Nichos y Áreas de Distribución. CONABIO. https://sites.google.com/site/nichesa ndareasofdistribution/sobre- losautores/jorge-soberon (Mayo de 2012).
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901637106
Soria-auza, R. W., M. Kessler, K. Bach, P. M. Barajas-Barbosa, M. Lehnert et al. 2010. Impact of the quality of climate models for modelling species occurrences in countries with poor climatic documentation: A case study from Bolivia. Ecological Modelling, 221: 1221-1229.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.01.004
Thuiller, W., B. Lafourcade, R. Engler & M. Araujo. 2009. BIOMOD a platform for ensamble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography, 32:369-373.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x
Thuiller, W., D. M. Richardson, P. Pysek, G. F. Midgley, G. O. Hughes & M. Rouget. 2005. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology, 11:2234-2250.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001018.x
Varela S., R. P. Anderson, R. García-Valdés & F. Fernández-González. 2014. Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography, 37:1084-1091
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00441.x
Veloz, S. D. 2009. Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. Journal of Biogeography, 36: 2290-2299.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.x
Whittaker, R. J., M. B. Araújo, P. Jepson, R. J. Ladle, J. E. M. Watson & K. J. Willis. 2005. Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions, 11: 3-23.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x
Wiens J. J., D. D. Ackerly, A. P. Allen, B. L. Anacker, L. B. Buckley, H. V. Cornell, E. I. Damschen, T. J. Davies, J. A. Grytnes, S. P. Harrison et al. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters 13: 1310-1324.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x
Wilson, K. A., M. I. Westphal, H. P. Possingham & J. Elith. 2005. Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data. Biological Conservation, 122: 99-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.004
Zimmermann, N. E., T. C. Edwards, C. H. Graham, P. B. Pearman & J. C. Svenning. 2010. New trends in species distribution modelling. Ecography, 33:985-989.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2016 Jorge Luis Becerra López , Ulises Romero Méndez, Aurelio Ramírez Bautista, Jesús Salvador Becerra López
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los documentos están protegidos por una licencia Creative Commons de Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Usted es libre para Compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato) y Adaptar el documento (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material) para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente, siempre que cumpla la condición de:
Atribución: Usted debe reconocer el crédito de una obra de manera adecuada, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciante o lo recibe por el uso que hace.