Post-vaccionation Evaluation of the Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Population in a Farm from Iguala Guerrero, Mexico

Authors

  • Guillermo Palacios Bautista Unidad Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales de la UAGRO
  • Delia Inés Domínguez García Unidad Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales de la UAGRO
  • Martín Ortiz Estrada Unidad Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales de la UAGRO
  • José Cruz López Velázquez Unidad Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales de la UAGRO
  • Rodrigo Rosario Cruz Centro Nacional de Investigaciones en Parasitología Veterinaria del INIFAP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v1i2.231

Keywords:

Boophilus microplus, Integrated control, Cattle ticks

Abstract

The study was conducted on a dual purpose ranch from Iguala Guerrero, Mexico. Before the study was started, about 30 engorged female ticks were collected in order to carry out a toxicological study by the larval packet test to determine susceptibility to conventional pesticides (pyrethroids, organophosphates and amitraz). Cattle were previously treated with ivermectin, 20 cattle were selected in two groups, which were monitored every 15 days in order to quantify the number of ticks in each group. The antibodies were significantly increased after the second dose of the immunogen and the number of ticks per animal on the ranch remained significantly low for 7 months, three months for the effect of the immunogen and 4 probably due to the significant decrease in ticks pasture. Integrated programs for tick control should involve both use of vaccines and pesticides in order to lower the use of pesticides, contamination of the environment and both milk and meat for human consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bock, R.; L. Jackson.; A. de Vos and W. Jorgensen. 2004. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 129. p. 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182004005190

Della Torre A and B. Arca. 2008. The role of research in molecular entomology in the fight against malaria vectors. Parassitology 50. p. 137–40.

De la Fuente, J.; K. M. Kocan and E. F. Blouin. 2007a. Tick vaccines and the transmission of tick-borne pathogens. Veterinary Research Commun. p. 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-007-0069-5

De la Fuente, J.; C Almazan, M. Canales.; J.M. Pérez de la Lastra.; K.M. Kocan and P. Willadsen. 2007b. A ten-year review of comercial vaccine performance for control of tick infestations on cattle. Anim Health Res Rev 8. p. 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252307001193

Estrada-Peña, A.; A. Bouattour.; J.L. Camicas.; A. Guglielmone.; I. Horak.; F. Jongejan.; A. Latif.; R. Pegram and A. R. Walker. 2006. The known distribution and ecological preferences of the tick subgenus Boophilus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Africa and Latin America. Exp Appl Acarol 38. p. 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-0003-5

FAO (Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación). 2003. Resistencia a los antiparasitarios. Estado actual con énfasis en América Latina. Serie Producción Animal y Sanidad Animal. No 157. FAO, Roma. p. 51. https://doi.org/10.18356/a48b842b-es

García-García, J.C.; C Montero.; M. Redondo.; M. Vargas.; M. Canales,.; O. Boué.; M. Rodríguez.; M. Joglar.; H. Machado.; I. L. González.; M. Valdés.; L. Méndez and J. de la Fuente . 2000. Control of ticks resistant to immunization with Bm86 in cattle vaccinated with the recombinant antigen Bm95 isolated from the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Vaccine 18:2275–2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00548-4

George, J. E.; J. M. Pound y R. B. Davey. 2004. Chemical control of ticks on cattle and the resistance of these parasites to acaricides. Parasitology.129: 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182003004682

Hemingway J and B .J. Beaty. 2006. The innovative vector control consortium: improved control of mosquito-borne diseases. Trends Parasitol 22. p. 308–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.05.003

Hunfeld, K. P.; A. Hildebrandt and J. S. Gray. 2008. Babesiosis: recent insights into an ancient disease. Int. J. Parasitology 38. p. 1219–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.001

Jonsson, N. N.; R. E. Bock and W. K. Jorgensen. 2008. Productivity and health effects of anaplasmosis and babesiosis on Bos indicus cattle and their crosses, and the effects of differing intensity of tick control in Australia. Veterinary Parasitology. 155:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.022

Jonsson N. N.; R. Davis and M. de Witt 2001. An estimate of the economic effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on Queensland dairy farms. Aust Vet J. (79) 12: 826-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10929.x

Rosario C. R.; D. I. Domínguez-García.; C. E. Hernández.; S.I. Gutiérrez y S. E. Fitz. 2011. Efectos de la vacunación en el desarrollo ontogénico y la reproducción de la garrapata Boophilus microplus. Entomología Mexicana. p. 37-42.

Viera, M and A. Sastre. 2007. Differential Bos taurus cattle response to Babesia bovis infection. Vet. Parasitology 150. p. 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.08.022

Published

2013-12-24

How to Cite

Palacios Bautista , G., Domínguez García, D. I., Ortiz Estrada, M., López Velázquez, J. C. ., & Rosario Cruz, R. . (2013). Post-vaccionation Evaluation of the Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Population in a Farm from Iguala Guerrero, Mexico. Revista Biológico Agropecuaria Tuxpan, 1(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v1i2.231

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers