Assessment of ecosystem services: different languages for conservation in a priority area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v6i2.Especial.260Keywords:
conservation strategies, Biological Corridor of Could Forest, valuation of forest areasAbstract
The valuation of ecosystem services (SE) is a controversial issue since there are different perspectives. In general, four criteria have been used: intrinsic value (for the simple fact of existing), instrumental value (economic), relational (cultural) and biological value. Considering all of them, it is possible to generate an integrated value that leads to a better approximation of the importance of ecosystem services for the human well. In this work, maps have made that show the spatial variation of the SE assessment, considering the four criteria and an integral evaluation; in the Biological Corridor of the Cloud Forests, Mexico. Regarding the economic valuation, there were no areas of agreement between the payment of ecosystem services and use of forestry. In contrast, to cultural aspects and of intrinsic valuation, the areas with the most intensive use of firewood coincide with the presence of indigenous settlements, as well as, areas with forest cover. With this, it will be possible to generate a comprehensive assessment that will serve to identify priority sites for conservation and sustainable management.
Downloads
References
Bark, R. H., Colloff, M. J., Hatton-MacDonald, D., Pollino, C. A., Jackson, S. y Crossman, N. D. 2016. Integrated valuation of ecosystem services obtained from restoring water to the environment in a major regulated river basin. Integrated Valuation Ecosystemic Services Challenger Solutions 22, Part B: 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.002
Caballero, P. 2015. Preferencias en el aprovechamiento de la leña para uso doméstico en el municipio de Tlanchinol Hidalgo una aproximación etnobotánica cuantitativa. Tesis de Licenciatura. UAEH.
Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez- Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín- López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J. y Turner, N., 2016. Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of Natural Academic of Science 113: 1462-1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113
CONABIO. 2010. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad- El Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña en México: amenazas y oportunidades para su conservacióny manejo sostenible. México, DF 197 p.
CONAFOR. 2018. Comisión Nacional Forestal- Reporte de pago de servicios ambientales 2017 Hidalgo. CONAFOR. Pachucha, Hidalgo.
CONANP. 2014. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas - Estudio Previo Justificativo para el establecimiento del Área Natural Protegida competencia de la Federación Reserva de la Biosfera "Corredor Biológico del Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña" en el Estado de Hidalgo, México.
CONANP-GIZ. 2013. Programa de adaptación al cambio climático Corredor Ecológico de la Sierra Madre Oriental. CONANP- GIZ. D.F, México. Pp. 66
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A.,Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., Koetz, T., Leadley, P., Lyver, P., Mace, G. M., Martin-Lopez, B., Okumura, M., Pacheco, D., Pascual, U., Pérez, E. S., Reyers, B., Roth, E., Saito, O., Scholes, R. J., Sharma, N., Tallis, H., Thaman, R., Watson, R., Yahara, T., Hamid, Z. A., Akosim, C., Al-Hafedh, Y., Allahverdiyev, R., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., Asfaw, Z., Bartus, G., Brooks, L. A., Caillaux, J., Dalle, G., Darnaedi, D., Driver, A., Erpul, G., Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P., Failler, P., Fouda, A. M. M., Fu, B., Gundimeda, H., Hashimoto, S., Homer, F., Lavorel, S., Lichtenstein, G., Mala, W. A., Mandivenyi, W., Matczak, P., Mbizvo, C., Mehrdadi, M., Metzger, J. P., Mikissa, J. B., Moller, H., Mooney, H. A., Mumby, P., Nagendra, H., Nesshover, C., Oteng-Yeboah, A. A., Pataki, G., Roué, M., Rubis, J., Schultz, M., Smith, P., Sumaila, R., Takeuchi, K., Thomas, S., Verma, M., Yeo-Chang, Y. y Zlatanova, D., 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people. Open Issue 14: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
Diaz, S., Pataki. G., Roth, E., Watson, R. T., et al., 2014. Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services. Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn
Galicia, L., Chávez-Vergara, B. M., Kolb, M., Jasso-Flores, R. I., Rodríguez-Bustos, L. A., Solís, L. E. y Villanueva, A. 2018. Perspectivas del enfoque socioecológico en la conservación, el aprovechamiento y pago de servicios ambientales de los bosques templados de México. Madera y Bosques, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2018.2421443
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D., Berry, P., Dunford, R. y Harrison, A.P. 2016. Concepts and Methods in Ecosystem Services Valuation, en: Marion, P., Haines-Young, R., Fish R. y Turner. R. K. (eds.). Routledge handbook of ecosystem services. Routledge, Pp 8-13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775302-9
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, M., Barton, D., Braat, L., Saarikoski, H., Kelemen, M. et al. 2014, EU FP7 Open NESS Project Deliverable 4.1, State-of- the-art report on integrated valuation of ecosystem services. European Commission. Brussels
INEGI. 2010. Consensos y Conteos. Censo de Población y Vivienda Principales resultados por localidad (ITER). Disponible en: http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/consulta_resultados/iter2010.aspx
INEGI. 2017. Usuarios de leña en México.Disponible en:https://www.gob.mx/cofepris/acciones-y-programas/3-usuarios-de-lena-en-mexico
Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Martín-López, B., Barton, D. N., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Boeraeve, F., McGrath, F. L., Vierikko, K., Geneletti, D., Sevecke, K. J., Pipart, N., Primmer, E., Mederly, P., Schmidt, S., Aragão, A., Baral, H., Bark, R. H., Briceno, T., Brogna, D., Cabral, P., De Vreese, R., Liquete, C., Mueller, H., Peh, K. S.-H., Phelan, A., Rincón, A. R., Rogers, S. H., Turkelboom, F., Van Reeth, W., van Zanten, B. T., Wam, H. K. y Washbourn, C.-L., 2016. A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decision. Ecosystem Services, 22: 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007
Martin, D. M. y Mazzotta, M. 2018. Non- monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions. Ecosystem Services, 29, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.022
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García- Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado- Arzuaga, I., Amo, D. G. D., Gómez- Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J. A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C. y Montes, C. 2012. Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLOS ONE 7, e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
Ponce-Reyes, R., Nicholson, E., Baxter, P. W., Fuller, R. A. y Possingham, H. 2013. Extinction risk in cloud forest fragments under climate change and habitat loss. Diversity and Distributions 19(5-6):518-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12064
Schroder, S. A. K., Tóth, S. F., Deal, R. L., y Ettl, G. J. 2016. Multi-objective optimization to evaluate tradeoffs among forest ecosystem services following fire hazard reduction in the Deschutes National Forest, USA. Ecosystem Services, 22:328-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.006
Tadaki, M., J. Sinner, and K. M. A. Chan.2017.Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts. Ecology and Society 22(1):7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08999-220107
TEEB. 2013. - The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity -Guidance Manual for TEEB Country Studies, Version 1.0. ed.
Toledo-Aceves, T., Meave, J. A., González-Espinosa, M., y Ramírez-Marcial, N.011. Tropical montane cloud forests: current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. Journal of environmental management, 92(3): 974-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.007
Wam, H. K., Bunnefeld, N., Clarke, N. y Hofstad, O. 2016. Conflicting interests of ecosystem services: Multi-criteria modelling and indirect evaluation of trade-offs between monetary and non- monetary measures. Ecosystem Services, 22:280-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Jessica Bravo Cadena y Numa P. Pavón
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The works are under a Creative Commons Atribution 4.0 Internacional License
You are free to Share (copy and and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt the work (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
