Corn hay as fodder for alternative drought in low income holdings: 1. Nutritional value

Authors

  • José Francisco Cervantes Becerra Campo Experimental San Luis, INIFAP
  • Jorge Urrutia Morales Campo Experimental San Luis, INIFAP
  • Héctor Guillermo Gámez Vázquez Campo Experimental San Luis, INIFAP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v1i2.232

Keywords:

Maize, Nutritive value, Silage, Hay

Abstract

In order to assess the nutritional value of corn hay as alternative to the silage in low-income exploits, a study was conducted in two localities of San Luis Potosi State. A plot of maize variety H-311 was established in each locality under raining conditions. Complete plants were harvested when the grain was found in dough-milk stage, half of them were ensiled and the other was dried. A representative sample from each batch were taken and sent to laboratory for determining crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and in-situ dry matter digestibility (ISDMD). Nutritional value of silage and hay from the first locality show that ADF and CP content was similar in the two types of forages, but ISDMD was greater (P = 0.008) in silage. In the second locality, results show that ADF content was lower (P = 0.023) in hay, while CP was similar (P = 0.083) in both two types of fodder, although, a tendency to be higher in silage was observed. The ISDMD was higher (P < 0.0001) in hay. The results of this study suggest that while there could be differences in digestibility, is not convincing, since in one locality the silage showed better digestibility, while in the other the hay was better. In conclusion, hay maize is an efficient and economical method to preserve the maize forage, representing an alternative for obtaining quality forage to be used in critical times by low-income farmers from the semiarid region of northern Mexico.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemistry). 2000. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists. 17 ed. Gaithersburg MD, USA. 2200 p.

Center CF, Jones GD, Carter MT. 1970. Dry matter accumulation and depletion in leaves, stems, and ears of maturating maize. Agron J. 62:535-537. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200040033x

Cummins, D.G. 1970. Quality and yield of corn plants and component parts when harvested for silage at different maturity stages. Agron. J. 62:781. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060030x

Filya I. 2004. Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole crop maize silage harvested at four stages of maturity. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 116:141-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.06.003

Fuentes J., Magaña C. Suarez L., Peña R., Rodríguez S. y Ortiz de la Rosa B. 2001. Análisis químico y digestibilidad “in vitro” de rastrojo de maíz (Zea mays L.). Agronomía Mesoamericana. 12:189-192. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v12i2.17232

Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). U.S. Department of evaluation. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2717-agriculture Handbook 370. p. 18-19. 2729.

Mcdonald, P., Edward R.A. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35:201-211. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns19760033

Medina G.G., Díaz P.G., Loredo O.C., Serrano A.V. y Cano G.M.A. 2005. Estadísticas Climatológicas Básicas del Estado de San Luis Potosí (Periodo 1961-2001), Libro Técnico No. 2, Campo Experimental San Luis CIRNE-INIFAP. p. 170-171 y p. 200-201.

SAS Institute Inc. 2000. Star Statistics User Guide. Version 4.0.3 (Academic).

Shroyer, J.P. and Scaffer. J.A. 1982. Timely cutting of sorghum and corn silage. Cooperative Extension Service. Kansas State University, Manhattan, U.S.A. November 1982.

Urrutia M.J., Hernández A.J.A.,Altamira E.A., Beltrán L.S, Gámez V.H. Díaz G.M.O. 2011. Nutritional characteristics of silage and hay of pearl millet at four phenological stages. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10:1378-1382.

Urrutia M.; Martínez L.; Shimada A. 1982. Valor nutritivo de rastrojo y ensilaje de maíz con o sin mazorca tratados con hidróxido de sodio para borregos en crecimiento. Tec. Pecu. Méx. 42:7-16.

Vanzant, ES; Cochran, RC; Titgemeyer, EC. 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff

Vilela HH, Vilela RA, Vieira PF, Andrade GA, Evangelista AR, de Souza-Almeida GB. 2008. Valor nutritivo de silagens de milho colhido em diversos estádios de maturação. R Bras Zootec. 37:1192-1199. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-35982008000700008

Weaver, D.E., Coppock, C.E., Lake, G.B. and Everett, R. M. 1978. Effect of maturation on composition and dry matter digestibility of corn plant parts. J. Dairy Sci. 61:1782. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(78)83803-x

Wright D.L., Jowers H.E. 2007. Using drought-stressed corn for silage, hay, or grazing. Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 3 pp. (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AG/A G27900.pdf).

Published

2013-12-10

How to Cite

Cervantes Becerra , J. F., Urrutia Morales, J., & Gámez Vázquez, H. G. (2013). Corn hay as fodder for alternative drought in low income holdings: 1. Nutritional value. Revista Biológico Agropecuaria Tuxpan, 1(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v1i2.232

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)