Corn hay as fodder for alternative drought in low income holdings: 1. Nutritional value
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v2i1.298Keywords:
maize, nutritive value, silage, hayAbstract
In order to assess the nutritional value of corn hay as alternative to the silage in low-income exploits, a study was conducted in two localities of San Luis Potosi State. A plot of maize variety H-311 was established in each locality under raining conditions. Complete plants were harvested when the grain was found in dough-milk stage, half of them were ensiled and the other was dried. A representative sample from each batch were taken and sent to laboratory for determining crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and in-situ dry matter digestibility (ISDMD). Nutritional value of silage and hay from the first locality show that ADF and CP content was similar in the two types of forages, but ISDMD was greater (P = 0.008) in silage. In the second locality, results show that ADF content was lower (P = 0.023) in hay, while CP was similar (P = 0.083) in both two types of fodder, although, a tendency to be higher in silage was observed. The ISDMD was higher (P < 0.0001) in hay. The results of this study suggest that while there could be differences in digestibility, is not convincing, since in one locality the silage showed better digestibility, while in the other the hay was better. In conclusion, hay maize represents an alternative for obtaining quality forage to be used in critical times by low-income farmers from the semiarid region of northern Mexico.
Downloads
References
Weaver, D. E., Coppock, C. E., Lake, G. B. y Everett, R. M. 1978. Effect of maturation on composition and dry matter digestibility of corn plant parts. J. Dairy Sci., 61: 1782.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(78)83803-x
Shroyer, J. P. y Scaffer, J. A. 1982. Timely cutting of sorghum and corn silage. Cooperative Extension Service. Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas state University, Manhattan Kansas, U.S.A.
https://doi.org/10.47886/9781934874127.ch11
Cummins, D. G. 1970. Quality and yield of corn plants and component parts when harvested for silage at different maturity stages. Agron. J., 62: 781.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060030x
Perry, L. J. y Compton, W. A. 1977. Serial measures of dry matter accumulation and forage cuality of leaves stalks and ears of three corn hybrids. Agron. J., 69: 751.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900050005x
Goering, H. K. y Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). U.S. Department of agriculture Handbook, 370:18-19.
Snedecor, G. W. y Cochran, W. G. 1967. Métodos estadísticos. 1 Ed. C.E.C.S.A. México. pp. 136-138.
Medina, G. G., Díaz, P. G., Loredo, O. C., Serrano, A. V. y Cano, G. M. A. 2001. Estadísticas Climatológicas Básicas del Estado de San Luis Potosí (Periodo 1961-2001), Libro Técnico No. 2, Campo Experimental San Luis CIRNE-INIFAP. pp. 170-171 y pp. 200-201.
Urrutia, M., Martínez, L. y Shimada, A. 1982. Valor nutritivo de rastrojo y ensilaje de maíz con o sin mazorca tratados con hidróxido de sodio para borregos en crecimiento. Tec. Pec. Mex., 42: 7-16.
Fuentes, J., Magaña, C., Suarez, L., Peña, R., Rodríguez, S. y Ortiz de la Rosa, B. 2001. Análisis químico y digestibilidad “in vitro” de rastrojo de maíz (Zea mays L.). Agronomía Mesoamericana, 12(2): 189-192.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 José Francisco Cervantes Becerra, Jorge Urrutia Morales y Héctor Guillermo Gámez Vázquez
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The works are under a Creative Commons Atribution 4.0 Internacional License
You are free to Share (copy and and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt the work (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.