Evaluation of physico-chemical quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill), saladette type Variety El Cid F-1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v4i2.70Keywords:
tomato, handling, maturationAbstract
The experiment was performed in order to determine some of the physico-chemical characteristics under different degrees of maturity, selecting according to their percentage of coloring; weight, dimensions, pH, Brix and titratable acidity which are parameters to decide if the fruit is covered by the quality standards required by the wholesale market, and relate these characteristics with regard to nutrition to be used. In this way the changes will be determined in the quality of tomato fruits at various stages of maturity in which they were harvested. The objective was to "assess the quality of the crop of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) in each of its six degrees of maturation." The results show that the earliest stages of maturity showed the highest for fruit width variable values. (6.5306, 6.3360 and 6.0162 respectively), with respect to the long fruit statistical analysis shows that red degree course introduced the largest polar diameter range., While the broken acquired lesser value, although no significant difference was presented between treatments. The red light was the highest weight with respect to other grades while the broken color was just the opposite.
Downloads
References
Bautista M.N. y Alvarado L.J. 2005. Producción de jitomate en invernadero. Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas. Campus Montecillo. México.
Bautista N., Chavarin C. y Valenzuela F. 2008. Jitomate, tecnología para su producción en invernadero. México: COLPOS.
Cantwell M. y Kasmire R. 2007. Sistemas de manejo poscosecha: hortalizas y frutos. Kader, A. (Ed.). Tecnología Poscosecha de Cultivos Hortofrutícolas. Centro de Información e Investigación en Tecnología Poscosecha. Universidad de California, Davis, California, EE.UU: pp:457-474.
Dávila-Aviña J., Gonzales-Aguilar G., Ayala-Zavaleta J., Sepúlveda D, y Olivas G. 2011. Compuestos volátiles responsables del sabor del tomate. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 34:pp:133-143.
https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2011.2.133
Dominique B. 2011. Enfermedades del tomate, identificar, conocer, controlar (Mundi- Prensa ed.). Francia: Quae.
Fánor Casierra-Posada, O.E.A. 2008. Calidad en frutos de tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cosechados en diferentes estados de madurez. Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal.
Gould Wilbur A. 1992. Tomato production, processing and quality technology. Thirth edition. University Ohio. pp:347-365.
https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845696146.3.285
INTA. 2013. Guia para el reconocimiento de enfermedades en el cultivo de tomate. Estacion experimental agropecuaria El Colorado (primera edicion ed.). Argentina: INTA.
Jones J.B. 1999. Tomato plant culture in the field, greenhouse and home garden. USA: CRC. USA.
Mendoza L.U.A. 1995. Evaluación de 15 variedades precoses e intermedias de jitomate.Tesis profesional. Departamento de fitotecnia. Universidad Autonoma Chapingo. Chapingo, México.121 p.
Ortiz S.P. and J.V.G. 2010. Quantitative comparison of free and bound volátiles of two comercial tomato cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum L.) during ripening.
Pantastico E.D. 1984. Fisiología de la pos recolección, manejo y recolección de frutas y hortalizas tropicales y subtropicales. Segunda impresión. Ed. C.E.C.S.A. México. 633 p.
Reid M. 2007. Maduración e índices de madurez. Tecnología Poscosecha de Cultivos Hortofrutícolas. Universidad de California, Davis, California, EE.UU.. Kader, A. pp:63-71.
Rodríguez H., Muñoz S. y Alcorta E. 2006. El tomate rojo, sistema hidropónico. México: Trillas.
Rosales V.M.A. 2008. Producción y calidad nutricional en frutos de tomate cherry cultivados en dos invernaderos mediterráneos experimentales: respuestas metabólicas y fisiológicas. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada. Granda, España. 231 p.
Santiago J., Mendoza M., y Borrego F. 1998. Evaluación de tomate (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) en invernadero: criterios fisiologicos y fenológicos. Agronomia mesoamericana. 9: pp:59-65.
https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v9i1.24633
USDA. 1991. U.S. Standards for Grades of Fresh Tomatoes. USDA, Agr. Mktg. Serv.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 L. M. Dávila, H. T. Ramírez, R. H Ortiz, T. I Landero, R.V Enriquez
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The works are under a Creative Commons Atribution 4.0 Internacional License
You are free to Share (copy and and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt the work (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.