Indicators of comfort in housed dairy cows in the region of tuxpan, veracruz and the highlands

Authors

  • Miguel Ángel Lammoglia Villagomez Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias de la Universidad Veracruzana, Campus Tuxpan
  • Rubén López Castro Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias de la Universidad Veracruzana, Campus Tuxpan
  • Amalia Cabrera Nuñez Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias de la Universidad Veracruzana, Campus Tuxpan
  • Iliana Del Carmen Daniel Rentería Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias de la Universidad Veracruzana, Campus Tuxpan
  • Nora Garcez Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias de la Universidad Veracruzana, Campus Tuxpan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v2i1.306

Keywords:

confort, indicators, housed, cows

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the comfort of housed dairy cows in the region of Tuxpan, Veracruz and the highlands during June 2013 using different indicators (standing = PA; Eating = C; lying down =E, at milking = OR) . We used two farms, one in the highlands with 3 different types of barns: 1) modern (NM), 2) modern with nebulizers (NMN) and 3) old (NV) and the other in the region of Tuxpan, Veracruz with 2 different types of barns 1) with best shade (MS) and 2) decreased shade (SD). Cows were observed (3 cows per barn) for 2 periods of 24 hours. ANOVA was used to analyze the data. There was no difference (P=.10) between the farms but there was a barn effect (P = .05) in the comfort indicators. The cows spent more time lying down (11.5±0.8 hours), eating (5.7±0.53 hours) and at milking (3.2±0.3 hours) in the barn NMN than in the barns NV (8.8±0.7, 5.1±.4, 1.5±0.2 hours, respectively), NM (10.0±0.8, 4.7± 0.5, 3.0±0.3 hours, respectively), MS (9.6±0.3, 5.1±0.2, 2.7±0.1 hours, respectively) and SD (8.0±0.8, 4.9±0.5, and 2.8±0.3 hours, respectively). The cows in the NV barn spent more time standing than in the other pens. In conclusion, barn conditions can influence the time cows spend resting, eating and standing and therefore cow´s comfort.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Árabe, C. W., y Albright, J. 1997. The Behavior of Cattle. 1ª University Press, Cambridge. UK.L.ed.,

Callejo-Ramos, A. 2009. Cow Comfort, El bienestar de la vaca lechera. Alojamiento y bienestar. pp. 141-142.

Duncan, J. H. 1990. Behavioral assessment of welfare. En: Mench, JA, SJ Mayer, and L Krulisch.(eds) The Well Being of Agricultural Animals in Biomedical and Agricultural Research. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare. Bethesda, Maryland. USA.

Grant, R. J. 2006. Incorporating dairy cow behavior into management tools. Proceedings from Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop.

Gary, P. M. 1987. A model for assessing the impact of behavioral stress on domestic animals. J Anim. Sci., 65: 1228-1235.

Published

2014-07-16

How to Cite

Lammoglia Villagomez , M. Ángel, López Castro, R., Cabrera Nuñez, A., Daniel Rentería, I. D. C. ., & Garcez, N. (2014). Indicators of comfort in housed dairy cows in the region of tuxpan, veracruz and the highlands. Revista Biológico Agropecuaria Tuxpan, 2(1), 283–287. https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v2i1.306

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)