Morphological diversity in maize landraces in Tabasco state, Mexico

Authors

  • Mauro Sierra Macías INIFAP-Campo Experimental Cotaxtla
  • Pablo Andrés Meza INIFAP-Campo Experimental Cotaxtla
  • Sabel Barrón Freyre INIFAP-Campo Experimental Cotaxtla
  • Artemio Palafox Caballero INIFAP-Campo Experimental Cotaxtla
  • Isaac Meneses Márquez INIFAP-Campo Experimental Cotaxtla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v2i1.279

Keywords:

Zea mays L, genetic diversity, maize landraces, humid tropic

Abstract

In regard to characterizing ears and identifying races in native maize varieties and making a distribution map, during 2008 to 2010 were collected samples based on the knowing the presence of these kind of maize. There were used 10 representative ears for getting information of quantitative and qualitative traits on each sample. There were gotten 39 maize collections in five municipalities of Tabasco state, given by 37 farmers in 26 locations. There were utilized the principal components analysis methodology, for grouping landraces according to the traits measured. The racial classification of the collections indicate that in 30.8% of them, were found three racial groups: Tuxpeño, Olotillo and Tepecintle. There were identifyied intermediate shapes among the racial groups in 69.2% of the samples. It indicates the maize genetic diversity in Tabasco state. The most important race was Tuxpeño with 25.6% of the samples. The first three components created by the ACP explained 70% of the variability of each race. The traits that having more influence were: long and diameter ear, the relation long/diameter, rows number, number of grains by row, and thickness of grain, The projections of the principal components 1 (CP1) and 2 (CP2) separated three groups of populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). 2011. Recopilación, generación, actualización y análisis de información acerca de la diversidad genética de maíces y sus parientes silvestres en México. CONABIO –INIFAP – INE. 98 p.

https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2019.42.0187

Espinosa, C. A., Tadeo, R. M., Turrent, F. A., Gómez, M. N. O., Sierra, M. M., Caballero, H F., Valdivia, B. R., y Rodríguez, M. F. A. 2009. El potencial de las variedades nativas y mejoradas de maíz. Ciencias, 92-93: 118-125.

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v21i1.4909

Hernández, X. E. y Alanís, F. G. 1970. Estudio morfológico de cinco nuevas razas de maíz de la Sierra Madre Occidental de México: Implicaciones filogenéticas y fitogeografícas. Agrociencia, 1: 3-30.

Miranda, C. S. 2000. Mejoramiento genético del maíz en la época prehispánica. Agricultura Técnica en México 26: 3-15.

SAGARPA-SIAP. 2012. Atlas Agropecuario y Pesquero. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP), Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA). México, DF. 219 p.

https://doi.org/10.32870/cer.v0i118.7067

SAS. Institute Inc. 1990. SAS Users’ guide: Statistics, Version 6. Cary, NC. SAS Institute, Inc.

SNICS-CP. 2009. Manual Grafico para la Descripción Varietal de Maíz (Zea mays L.). Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas (SNICS) Colegio de Postgraduados (CP). SAGARPA. 118 p.

Wellhausen, E. J., Roberts, L. M. y Hernández, X. E. en colaboración con P. C. Mangelsdorf. 1951. Razas de Maíz en México. Su Origen, Características y Distribución. Folleto Técnico N° 5. Oficina de Estudios Especiales. Secretaria de Agricultura y Ganadería. México. 237 p.

https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v1i02.1582

Published

2014-07-23

How to Cite

Sierra Macías, M., Andrés Meza, P., Barrón Freyre, S. ., Palafox Caballero, A. ., & Meneses Márquez, I. . (2014). Morphological diversity in maize landraces in Tabasco state, Mexico. Revista Biológico Agropecuaria Tuxpan, 2(1), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v2i1.279

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)